Written submissions show what was produced. Integrevise shows what was actually understood. Because real understanding is proven through conversation.
Trusted by institutions worldwide
What it changes
Verifying understanding changes what assessment can prove. These are the outcomes that matter most to faculty, students and the institution.
When students explain their own submission in their own words, copied or AI-generated answers have nowhere to hide. Integrity is confirmed through understanding, not chased with detectors or risked on false accusations.
Faculty review verified outcomes in minutes per student, instead of scheduling and invigilating back-to-back vivas. The effort that used to make oral assessment impractical simply goes away.
Students get feedback tied to their own work and build the skill of explaining their reasoning aloud. Gaps surface early, while there is still time to act on them.
Each result comes with consistent evidence you can stand behind at moderation, appeal or accreditation, and it holds up long after the grade is given, across the whole cohort.
End to end
From the moment it's switched on to the feedback students receive, Integrevise runs inside the way faculty already assess, not as a parallel process alongside it.
Set up
There's nothing to build or redesign. You enable Integrevise on an existing brief, and it pulls the rubric and submissions from the LMS, builds a question set from each student's own work, and lets faculty set response time, attempts and special considerations, all within existing criteria and grade boundaries.
Deliver
Each student explains their reasoning in a structured, adaptive session that runs asynchronously, with no timetabling or invigilation. The questions respond to what each student actually says, and it works the same for remote and in-class cohorts.
Mark & moderate
Faculty review each oral response next to the written submission, with rubric-aligned evidence captured for every student. Every session is recorded and audit-ready, and faculty keep full control of grades and judgement throughout.
Feedback & learning
The same session that verifies understanding feeds it forward. Students get instant feedback they can act on, while faculty see who is secure, who is at risk and where the gaps sit across the module and department.
Where it fits
Integrevise layers onto the assessments you already run, from a single essay to a final-year project. If a task asks students to explain, justify or reflect, it can be verified through conversation.
Coursework
Pair any written submission with a short oral check. Students explain the choices behind their own work in their own words, so the grade reflects genuine understanding rather than the document alone. This is the most common starting point, and it sits on top of the coursework you already set.
Continuous learning
Place short oral checks across a module instead of only at the end. Students explain their reasoning as they go, so gaps surface while there's still time to act.
Practical
Confirm students grasp what happened in the lab and why. Probe experimental design, results and interpretation without booking another session.
Beyond writing
Students upload work that isn't an essay, from code and maths to images and designs, then explain the decisions behind it in the same oral check.
Skills
Give students low-stakes reps at explaining their thinking aloud, building the communication confidence that employers and assessors expect.
Feedback from educators and students using Integrevise.
What stood out immediately was the clarity it gives us. You can see exactly who understands their work and who doesn't. It removes the guesswork from marking and gives us something far more defensible.
I liked that it made me defend my position. Can you actually verbalize why you were doing what you were doing?
I write a lot with AI. I care less about people using AI to write and more that they understand what the AI just said, because it often gets things wrong.
It keeps you accountable. It makes you know what you're writing about, so you can't really skip all those big steps.
If you can hold your understanding of these larger concepts, it demonstrates that you're a little bit more up to the task of the degree.
Now that I understand the program better, I can see its potential. I'm working on a paper for my next class and I went ahead and put it through.
I enjoyed how the AI was listening to me.
Integrevise strikes a strong balance between deepening student understanding and maintaining academic integrity, which makes it a valuable tool for modern higher education.
By prompting students to explain their thinking in a structured, low-pressure environment, it makes their understanding far more visible and highlights where they need to improve in a way that's difficult to achieve through written work alone.
What stood out immediately was the clarity it gives us. You can see exactly who understands their work and who doesn't. It removes the guesswork from marking and gives us something far more defensible.
I liked that it made me defend my position. Can you actually verbalize why you were doing what you were doing?
I write a lot with AI. I care less about people using AI to write and more that they understand what the AI just said, because it often gets things wrong.
It keeps you accountable. It makes you know what you're writing about, so you can't really skip all those big steps.
If you can hold your understanding of these larger concepts, it demonstrates that you're a little bit more up to the task of the degree.
Now that I understand the program better, I can see its potential. I'm working on a paper for my next class and I went ahead and put it through.
I enjoyed how the AI was listening to me.
Integrevise strikes a strong balance between deepening student understanding and maintaining academic integrity, which makes it a valuable tool for modern higher education.
By prompting students to explain their thinking in a structured, low-pressure environment, it makes their understanding far more visible and highlights where they need to improve in a way that's difficult to achieve through written work alone.
What stood out immediately was the clarity it gives us. You can see exactly who understands their work and who doesn't. It removes the guesswork from marking and gives us something far more defensible.
I liked that it made me defend my position. Can you actually verbalize why you were doing what you were doing?
I write a lot with AI. I care less about people using AI to write and more that they understand what the AI just said, because it often gets things wrong.
It keeps you accountable. It makes you know what you're writing about, so you can't really skip all those big steps.
If you can hold your understanding of these larger concepts, it demonstrates that you're a little bit more up to the task of the degree.
Now that I understand the program better, I can see its potential. I'm working on a paper for my next class and I went ahead and put it through.
I enjoyed how the AI was listening to me.
Integrevise strikes a strong balance between deepening student understanding and maintaining academic integrity, which makes it a valuable tool for modern higher education.
By prompting students to explain their thinking in a structured, low-pressure environment, it makes their understanding far more visible and highlights where they need to improve in a way that's difficult to achieve through written work alone.
What stood out immediately was the clarity it gives us. You can see exactly who understands their work and who doesn't. It removes the guesswork from marking and gives us something far more defensible.
I liked that it made me defend my position. Can you actually verbalize why you were doing what you were doing?
I write a lot with AI. I care less about people using AI to write and more that they understand what the AI just said, because it often gets things wrong.
It keeps you accountable. It makes you know what you're writing about, so you can't really skip all those big steps.
If you can hold your understanding of these larger concepts, it demonstrates that you're a little bit more up to the task of the degree.
Now that I understand the program better, I can see its potential. I'm working on a paper for my next class and I went ahead and put it through.
I enjoyed how the AI was listening to me.
Integrevise strikes a strong balance between deepening student understanding and maintaining academic integrity, which makes it a valuable tool for modern higher education.
By prompting students to explain their thinking in a structured, low-pressure environment, it makes their understanding far more visible and highlights where they need to improve in a way that's difficult to achieve through written work alone.
It would create questions based off what you said and pry a little bit deeper. It made you think about the concepts you were actually writing about.
One feature I liked was that when it asked a question, it skipped to that part of my paper, so I knew exactly where it was pulling from.
The AI system is helpful in answering the questions.
I love that concept. Writing a paper and then having a little interview to make sure it's actually me.
Some of these classes are so big and the professors are busy. You can't expect them to orally check every single student.
It helps me prioritize. I've got these two sections down, so I don't have to study them again, but these two I really need to focus on.
Once I got the hang of it, it was fairly intuitive.
Providing students with the opportunity to practice their presentations before the real assessment helped build their confidence and readiness.
It would create questions based off what you said and pry a little bit deeper. It made you think about the concepts you were actually writing about.
One feature I liked was that when it asked a question, it skipped to that part of my paper, so I knew exactly where it was pulling from.
The AI system is helpful in answering the questions.
I love that concept. Writing a paper and then having a little interview to make sure it's actually me.
Some of these classes are so big and the professors are busy. You can't expect them to orally check every single student.
It helps me prioritize. I've got these two sections down, so I don't have to study them again, but these two I really need to focus on.
Once I got the hang of it, it was fairly intuitive.
Providing students with the opportunity to practice their presentations before the real assessment helped build their confidence and readiness.
It would create questions based off what you said and pry a little bit deeper. It made you think about the concepts you were actually writing about.
One feature I liked was that when it asked a question, it skipped to that part of my paper, so I knew exactly where it was pulling from.
The AI system is helpful in answering the questions.
I love that concept. Writing a paper and then having a little interview to make sure it's actually me.
Some of these classes are so big and the professors are busy. You can't expect them to orally check every single student.
It helps me prioritize. I've got these two sections down, so I don't have to study them again, but these two I really need to focus on.
Once I got the hang of it, it was fairly intuitive.
Providing students with the opportunity to practice their presentations before the real assessment helped build their confidence and readiness.
It would create questions based off what you said and pry a little bit deeper. It made you think about the concepts you were actually writing about.
One feature I liked was that when it asked a question, it skipped to that part of my paper, so I knew exactly where it was pulling from.
The AI system is helpful in answering the questions.
I love that concept. Writing a paper and then having a little interview to make sure it's actually me.
Some of these classes are so big and the professors are busy. You can't expect them to orally check every single student.
It helps me prioritize. I've got these two sections down, so I don't have to study them again, but these two I really need to focus on.
Once I got the hang of it, it was fairly intuitive.
Providing students with the opportunity to practice their presentations before the real assessment helped build their confidence and readiness.
Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard, Brightspace, Teams, and LTI 1.3 platforms.
Moodle
Canvas
Blackboard
Need another LMS?
If your platform is not listed, we can confirm compatibility or scope a custom integration path with your team.
Privacy, security and resilience built into data handling by design.
The practical answers faculty, IT and procurement want before a pilot.
Ready to finally assess what matters? No commitment. 20 minute discovery. Clarity on how this fits your modules.
Share a few details and we’ll get back to you. No call required.